Nerman Fatic vs Quentin Folliot Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs Q. Folliot

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

225

C. Rank

894

191

Best Rank

488

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Quentin Folliot

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

225

C. Rank

894

191

Best Rank

488

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Folliot

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Quentin Folliot winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Quentin Folliot was at the M15 Belgrade, 04-07-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	1
Folliot	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) M15 Belgrade(07-04-19)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Quentin Folliot

N. Fatic vs Q. Folliot H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	Q. Folliot
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$0
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	56.30% (201-156)
1	Clay	0
12	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs Q. Folliot Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 45.47% of points on their second serve, while Quentin Folliot has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quentin Folliot has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.11% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quentin Folliot has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Quentin Folliot winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Quentin Folliot has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 139/99), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/13).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Quentin Folliot has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Quentin Folliot being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Quentin Folliot winning 0.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Quentin Folliot was at the M15 Belgrade, 04-07-2019, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.83 while Quentin Folliot has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quentin Folliot has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quentin Folliot has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Quentin Folliot Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs Q. Folliot H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	Q. Folliot
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	8
0	Aces (Total)	1
2	Total Double Faults	1
1:20:0	Average Match Time	1:20:0
66% (38/58)	1st Serve %	62% (37/60)
66% (25/38)	1st Serve Win %	54% (20/37)
45% (9/20)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (10/23)
63% (5/8)	Break Pts Won %	43% (3/7)
50% (30/60)	Return Points Win %	41% (24/58)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

Q. Folliot Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Maceio - 18-03-2024
SF Mateus AlvesM. Alves	L	6-2 4-2 ret.	Stats
QF Jose PereiraJ. Pereira	W	6-4 7-6(2)	Stats
R2 Gustavo Ribeiro De AlmeidaG. Ribeiro	W	3-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Enzo CrevelaroE. Crevelaro	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
M25 Feira de Santana - 11-03-2024
R1 Joaquim AlmeidaJ. Almeida	L	6-0 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs Q. Folliot Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	Q. Folliot
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	56.30% (201/156)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	55.86% (443/350)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	52.48% (3714/3363)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	57.00% (57/43)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	58.40% (139/99)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	26.32% (5/14)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.1
1598	Aces Total	355
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.13
1517	Total Double Faults	462
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:8:23
509.47	Average Opponent Rank	457.56
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	62% (10228/16456)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	62% (6387/10228)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (2981/6227)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (913/1948)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	44% (7076/16234)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	30.00% (3/7)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	57.06% (198/149)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (195/347)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (2/3)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (27/58)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (39/82)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (206/183)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (206/23)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (151/18)